Jump to content

1/72 Buffalo mojo build


Darren-345957

Recommended Posts

Did a quick, almost out of box, build of the vintage classic Brewster Buffalo so I thought I'd post and detail the build a little.


General parts quality and fit were good. A little fettling needed to get the rear canopy to sit correctly and a small trim of the inside parts on the lower fuselage to ensure the wings sat nice and flush.


The engine had a damaged push rod on one cylinder so I replaced that with stretched sprue. While I had the sprue out I also made a roll cage to replace the life raft tube behind the pilot's seat since this was a land based one.


Only a little filler was needed on the cowling and lower rear fuselage.


All in all quite a nice little kit with really nice, clear canopy.

forum_image_656172775f6ea.thumb.png.698489c90662d4be31a1ec47cc8a9d2c.png


forum_image_6561727d1f58f.thumb.png.f66ac5f1fbe6074d72a674503d816408.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. A nicely finished model.
I like the precise fit of the canopy. Did this just drop into place or did you have to work to achieve it?
Also, was the sky fuselage band painted or was it a decal(transfer)?

 

 

The front windscreen and sliding portion of the canopy didn't need much work, just minor clean up for a bit of flash. The rear fuselage needs a bit of a trim to match the triangular profile of the canopy since it has no taper, making it a bit wide at the top.

 

 

I had sprayed the sky over the top of the model when I did the bottom so I ended up masking the fuselage band rather than hoping the decal colour matched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Buffalump is one of my favourite aircraft and that is a nice clean build. I am always slightly surprised to be reminded that the RAF / RAAF used exactly the same camouflage colours in Malaya as they did in Kent. You sort of expect it would be different.

I'd love it in 1/24 with alternative decals for USN, USMC, RAF, RAAF and FAF users, but I suspect I'm one of only a handful of potential buyers for such a thing.

Can the fact that something's remained a Vintage Classic be taken, I wonder, to mean it sells OK when periodically reissued, but not well enough to merit a retool?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can the fact that something's remained a Vintage Classic be taken, I wonder, to mean it sells OK when periodically reissued, but not well enough to merit a retool?

 

 

Vintage Classic was coined to differentiate pre-2006 tools from Hornby era tools. Previously, folks could be caught unaware that the kit they were purchasing was an old one in a new box, rather than a new tooling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
  • Create New...