Jump to content

jopres57

Members
  • Posts

    406
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jopres57

  1. So far this year I've been having a go at some non-Airfix kits. The Super Sabre is a rather basic 'PM models' offering that I bought at a bargain price online. It seems like a 1960's mold but was apparently a new tool in 1991. I managed to liven it up a bit with some new decals by Xtradecal and Mcroscale, I also added a pilot figure and a different bomb load.

    DSC_0177.thumb.JPG.7e3cb41e5699610f25c66bf58eccf87d.JPG

    DSC_0176.thumb.JPG.8f8b37bb6a7a7fd1e3c9545769302cfe.JPG

    DSC_0175.thumb.JPG.86ff0e1d16e01fd7d70219c5fe063d81.JPG

    The Skynight and the Ki-102a are both 'Sword' kits. The last time I built a Skynight it was the chunky 'Matchbox' version, this one was a distinct improvement. The KI-102a was a completely new aircraft to me. I understand the type never entered service so I just finished it in an imaginary night fighter scheme.

    Both of the Sword kits are worthwhile builds. They aren't as highly detailed as the newer Airfix models but probably good enough for most people. There are a few firms that seem to make a good business from offering fairly basic replicas of obscure aircraft or obscure versions of well known aircraft, you only have to look at the 'Wishlists' thread on this forum to see that there are a wide range of possible subjects. Could be an option for Airfix for one or two new releases every year.

    • Like 3
  2. Good photo of a classic aircraft. I wonder what colour the rocket rails are, I always used to paint them underside colour but this is obviously wrong. I also have some after-market decals depicting the MB-T codes in sky rather than red but the latter seems correct from all the illustrations I've seen. 

    It makes you wonder how many of these two kits have been made over the years, individually and as a DD. I've still never found out what unit the 'yellow 3' Messerschmitt is from, the 'yellow 14' version was captured on Sicily, I've seen pictures of it. 

  3. I think I would prefer to go to war in a Typhoon, it looks like it would be more likely to return after any damage. It's a less expensive aircraft as well so there would be safety in probably more numbers. The Lightning is supposed to be undetectable but a competent enemy would probably find a way. Also, of course, the Typhoon is a better looking aircraft with a large British content, and comes in other colours apart from black.

  4. I always thought that the Paras were a good quality set compared to earlier Airfix offerings such as British and German infantry. I didn't think that not wearing 37 pattern webbing was a problem but I never realised that the Paras didn't usually use the Tommy gun or bazooka. Ironically enough most releases of this set have a picture on the front of a sergeant wearing webbing.

  5. You've made a good job of a kit that has been well liked over the years but is a bit basic to say the least. I'm glad to read that other people are still using brushes for painting.

  6. 9 hours ago, inkpen said:

    I note the flexibility in colours used, although my preference is for the black!  Thanks.

    I'm glad that black is definitely an alternative because light stone and black are the colours I painted my 1/76 Crusader a while ago. Most illustrations I've seen show tanks in a light stone and dark green scheme but its good to know that modellers have a choice, and there's no need to fret too much about accuracy. I noticed on the wikipedia entry for the tank that the vehicle pictured at the Tank Museum also appears to be in light stone and black. I do wonder if some vehicles that were delivered brand new to the middle east may have been painted overall green and given a disruptive coat of light stone in theatre, I think this cammo was fairly common for some years post war.

  7. That's a really good collection. I would like to see a return, in 1/72, of the British 105mm light gun and 1 tonne land rover by Airfix. The latter was used as a towing vehicle for the gun in its early days. The kits were originally issued separately by JB models about twenty years ago then re-released by Airfix, but only for a short time. They aren't easy to find at a sensible price these days.

  8. Can't believe that I actually started thinking about who would buy these paper planes and how big would they be. Still, my email arrived well after twelve as well so the jokes on Airfix. It was a good effort though 😀

  9. Checking out the Hannants website over the weekend I noticed they have some interesting future figure releases that are compatible with the Airfix Ferret. There are several resin Ferret crewmen from the 60's and 70's from the firm of 'Flightpath UK' and some new decals from 'Star Decals'. Along with various detailing sets that are becoming available the kit seems to have become really popular already.

  10. This is a vintage Hunter kit that I built recently. I finished it out of the box as a stress free build to remember one of my favourite Airfix models from back in the day.

     

    Hunter.thumb.JPG.f992baecf2327662037509b4385654d0.JPG

     

    Not long after I finished this I saw a short documentary on telly about the famous Black Arrows display team. Quite a few good shots of the Aircraft were shown, one in particular was shown taxiing on the ground. This particular machine had its outer wing leading edges in good condition, but the edges inboard of the strakes were distinctly weathered. . I don't know why this should be, unless the outer wings had recently received some maintenance.

    • Like 1
  11. Interesting to read that you're vintage bagged kit has parts missing. I have quite a few old kits like this and some of them have clearly been put into new plastic bags and re-sealed. One give away is when the old staple holes are still visible in the instructions.

  12. I have a kit of the SR 53 made by Ursus of Poland which, according to the net, is a re-boxing of the Airfix tool. Unfortunately I haven't got an Airfix original to compare it with. The AZ model is still simple in layout but has much better detail, although I do like to build old Airfix kits now and again, especially those that I missed back in the day. Wouldn't it be good though if something as rare as the Guideline missile set turned in an Eastern European factory.

     

    • Like 1
  13. Regarding the SR 53, I understand the original Airfix molds have been re-released by various eastern European companies over the years. I wondered if any of the old kits that are thought to have been lost actually have molds that have been stored abroad for years. Might it be financially viable to search them out and buy them back?

  14. Nice looking diarama. Just goes to show that many older kits still have mileage in them. The Liberator is a good example because of the wide choice of markings and colour schemes.

    • Like 1
  15. I wonder if that means that all the 'lost' images will be rediscovered lurking somewhere in the ether...

    I'm afraid not. The question has been asked. All images that we see now will remain and the stuff that was lost cannot be recovered.
    There are some attractive features they hope you all enjoy.

    Its a pity about all the lost images. Looks like Airfix have had an experience similar to that of Basil Fawlty with O'Reilly the builder; the lowest quote doesn't guarantee a decent job.grinning

     

     

  16. I also have a few models on stands but I don't like the idea of having unnecessary holes in the kits. I usually cut off the top hook on the Airfix stand and use clear plastic card to make a platform for a completed model to rest on. These platforms usually vary in size and construction depending on the subject, and often include a box type structure to cope with bombs or fuel tanks. It's a bit of a rough and ready solution but it does the job and more time could be taken for better results than mine.


    forum_image_65c0506855b9e.thumb.png.3dc7e3a76870f0946c102f38ed8e0a13.png


  17. From what I can gather the future of the Rotodyne was dependant on American sales that failed to materialise. If it had been bought, a few companies over there, like Pan Am, might have used it.

  18. The model at the rear is my original build OOB while that in the foreground is my modification to her configuration as at May 1941.

     

     

    That's an interesting photo of two well made models. I've made this kit before but never really appreciated the difference between out of the box and final appearance in 1941. As they say, a picture's worth a thousand words.

  19. The new one, not produced by Airfix, features mainly non-Airfix works of art produced by skilled modellers using a wide range of expensive products and tools - all very interesting but of limited value to my modelling. I feel like a basic paint-by-numbers guy watching Rembrandt at work.

    if there was a magazine for more basic modellers like myself then I’d subscribe but they all seem to be aimed at far more skilled and committed modellers than me.

     

     

    A while ago I used to read a couple of aviation modelling magazines that now seem to have ceased publication. One of them used to have regular reviews of new kits by readers, accompanied by a couple of pictures. Sadly an editorial mentioned that people had complained about some of these reviews because the completed models weren't up to standard. I think this attitude is just sad because it discourages people from enjoying the hobby.

×
  • Create New...