Andy P. Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 R4 curves are practically straight already. R5 I can kind of understand but R6 would have ardly any curve at all..I understand the lane crossing track but the the reasoning behuind the lane-changing curve is that you have to slow down for a curve anyway so it is better having it there.It also gives a more "racing line" look to the curves.Have a cross (or tight chicane) in a straight is almost always going to result in a crash, even if you have good braking... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pelle71 Posted March 11, 2019 Share Posted March 11, 2019 But R5 or R6 is for highspeed, if you driving old F1 cars like Lotus, C050 and March 721, C026 a radius R5 or R6 is going to be tight anyway :D I have a big track with 30 straights on the finnishline, have most R3 and R4 curves, the cars is sliding beutiful in the corners :D I like to build realistic tracks with long straights and smoth long curves, not a wormhole with 100+ R2's on a 3x3meter square. (Sorry my typing..) Regards from Sweden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy P. Posted March 11, 2019 Share Posted March 11, 2019 Sliding (drfting) costs time and speed... but to each his own I guess... :-D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.