Jump to content

Unrebuilt Merchant Navy


forester

Recommended Posts

Just read in the September issue of Railway Mag one with free DVD on Flying Scotsman, that ACE Locomotives the owners of Merchant Navy General Steam Navigation 35011 are aiming to do an unrebuilding restoration complete with air smooth casing and reinstating

the middle cylinder and Bulleid chain drive valve system.

If it does happen then there would be a good reason for Hornby to produce one or two models of the only Pacific class locomotive not produced.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 269
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Tony I have had to re read your post, "reinstate the middle cylinder". Original or rebuild, they are 3 cylinder. I think LC&DR's post was the better idea a newbuild with gear drive as envisaged.
If they go ahead, I can see it being somewhat costly,

six new driveing wheels will be required, just for starters.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Didn't rebuilding also involve a new middle cylinder?? They've got the boiler and frames, and bogie and pony trucks. You're right though, it will be expensive paying for all the coal those brutes ate, plus gallons of oil spread on tracks far and wide,

and on the boiler lagging.. Having the fire brigade on stand-by, to cope with the fires under the air-smoothed casing won't come cheap, etc etc etc

Stick to rebuilds!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a 37 in Police Colours,

perhaps we could have a 66 in fire and rescue colours following behind, putting out fires, any takers ??????
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I read somewhere the retro-rebuild is still being considered.

According to some of the histories of the class the reason Bulleid put chain drive in was he could not obtain the necessary material for the tried and tested rotary valve gear,

so he chose what he believed to be the next best thing. If the War had not happened I suspect instead of a Merchant Navy we would have had a Bulleidised LNER P2 or possibly a Pacific version. However the SR Civil Engineer was not happy about a leading pony

nor eight coupled wheels for an express passenger class.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick follow up the General Steam navigation is currently in ex Barry condition at Sellindge Kent. So it needs a lot of money spent on it

The artical refers to the replacement middle cylinder as to the most complex ever produced in preservation

with 42 internal core spaces - Tornado's only had 30.

ACE locomotives who own GSN say there is little point in restoring all MN's to the exact same condition.

Who knonws they may be able to stop the oil leaks and have fire resistant lagging

fitted so they won't need the fire brigade on standby.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



It would in fact be a really good opportunity to create a 'Super Pacific'. It is reasonably certain that the Jarvis rebuilds were a considerable improvement over

the original Bulleid design, albeit Bullied's machines were excellent when in good condition. However there will undoubtedly be scope for further improvement.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
It's got to be on the short list.

It comes in at number 8 for SR items on the 2012 poll. But that's higher than anything GWR, LMSR and LNER (except the K1).

http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/55319-mremag-rmweb-wishlist-poll-2012-results/

Of

course, were one to be made, I'd love to see flexible tooling to support the first five with the widow's peak, and in malachite.

I think Horby might be less ambitious with their 2013 announcements. so I'm not holding my breath.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
The passage at the end of my post, has been prepared by and within the meanderings of a well respected/trusted, Southern Railway Modeller. I`ve deliberately not mentioned any names. But having read between the lines, the inference is that there will be

"Southern" releases. Otherwise, why "a post prepared"?
With the announcement of an as built Merchant Navy, in N guage by the competition, there is a good chance that their CAD/CAM modeling design, will be rescaled to generate an 00 sweet of drawings! Its

only a matter of time!!!
Hornby may be only too aware of this? and are in a commanding position, component wise, to be first on the scene with a Merchant!
There is obviously more scope, if the model were based on the Series 2&3 of the class and this

is possibly the market that will be catered for. A series 1 is my personal choice, however would be happy to see this unique loco finally on the shelves.
Would like to think that those of us, who have contributed to this subject in the Forum, will get lucky

on the 17th of the Month
"I have a post prepared to also go live, here on this blog, at Midday on Monday 17th detailing the models of interest and relevant to Southern Railway / Southern Region modellers to save you wading through the whole list of announcements.

I can assure readers that despite reported difficult trading conditions / supply chain issues that Hornby are in the process of overcoming there are new and exciting models planned".
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is probably a clue on the Hornby Facebook page, unless Hornby have employed a subtle subterfuge to throw us all off the scent. There is a picture on there that includes a screenshot of a CAD design of the back end of a Southern related item, NOT

an MN, but with strong Maunsell and electrical leanings, I have also heard whispers, I shall say no more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Farish doing one in N it seems very probable that a 00 version will appear in a blue box in due course. We have all known about the Farish version for many months. It seems to me that only if Hornby's plans were well advanced, would they continue

after the Farish announcement.

I for one would prefer series 1 of the Merchant Navy.

If one did a series 1 and the other a series 2/3 that would be interesting. Murphy's law would dictate they would choose exactly the same version.

Are

there shades of the old Hall/Grange issue? We'll see.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm brassed off now. LC&DR is our resident expert, I'm seeing different posts, this class had many guises, until they were rebuilt. I believe no one has asked for the members of the class that had ASBESTOS air smoothing with longtidinal re-enforcing ribs.

LC&DR will put me straight, it is not as simple as saying that they were built in 3 batches of 10, changes/differences abounded in the first 5 alone.
***** MESSAGE TO HORNBY OR BLUE BOX ***** GET YOUR FINGER OUT AND FILL HIS GAP QUICKLY ******
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
  • Create New...