cowside Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 I moved Railmaster from a failed PC to a new one, and after reinstalling I copied all the relevant files across to the railmaster program folder and in particular resource.mdb, the Access database which holds details of the 65 locos on the system. I added a new loco into Railmaster and although it shows in Railmaster the loco does not work. I know the loco is OK because if I give it an ID of an existing loco it works under that ID! I have given the railmaster folder in program files all the permissions and now I have run out of ideas! It looks to me as if the Railmaster program is not using the current Access database but instead using an old copy in which the new loco does not exist. You would expect that railmaster.ini would show the file locations but it does not. Any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1ngr4y Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 It looks like you might have hit the same limit discovered by other users. Take a look at this thread:- https://www.hornby.com/uk-en/forum/post/view/topic_id/15739/?p=1 Ray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrissaf Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 Cowside, when you read the thread that Ray has kindly posted a link for, look out for the 'workaround' fix that is documented in it, that involves splitting up your loco fleet into 'groups'..It would also be beneficial if you used the inbuilt 'help support request' facility to report your issue to HRMS, the more reports they get regarding this issue, the more likely a more permanent fix will be forthcoming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowside Posted January 25, 2017 Author Share Posted January 25, 2017 Thanks - will try grouping as suggested in the other forum item. Will phone support to discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishmanoz Posted January 25, 2017 Share Posted January 25, 2017 You cannot phone HRMS and phoning HCC will get you nowhere. You need to email HRMS from the facility in the Help window of RM. PS. I've now answered you in all 3 threads you've posted this on. The answer in the DCC forum on activation is clearly not correct as you hadn't included the info on having exceeded the buggy 60 limit there. I say buggy as it shouldn't be there but clearly is, and needs reporting to HRMS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowside Posted January 25, 2017 Author Share Posted January 25, 2017 I have talked by phone to Hornby support about reinstallation and thought how refreshing it was to have helpful software support when in other arenas I have had to deal with Microsoft!!. I have only discovered about the buggy 60 limit tonight and followed the advice to break the locos into groups but that does not seem to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowside Posted January 25, 2017 Author Share Posted January 25, 2017 After rebooting the elink the grouping did work, but I will report to HRMS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
96RAF Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 Whilst researching for an article I spotted in my notes that the Elite is 'capable of simultaneously running 64 locos on two channels'..These are old notes and I cannot remember where I got the information from, but if true then this may be a finite limit forced upon RM by the Elite..Whether the eLink also has this limit I don't know, but it would be interesting if whoever is struggling with this could try it out and confirm either way..Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowside Posted January 26, 2017 Author Share Posted January 26, 2017 I have written at length to Hornby Railmaster Support. Having employed programmers I have a feeling it's not a bug, just that someone decided to put in a line of code to restrict to 60 locos for reasons known only to themselves. I have suggested that Railmaster at least add the workaround (ie putting the locos into groups) to their pdf guides even if they do not modify the program immediately. I wasted about 15 hours reinstalling and uninstalling locos, checking the security and permissions of the loco Access database resource.mdb, and even unsoldering a decoder I had fitted and resoldering another one. What a waste of time! And it would have been even longer without the help of the Forum! Thanks everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KNAP Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 I've wasted a lot of time myself with this and the fact that there also appears to be a restriction with programs.However, the odd issue is that when you switch back to "ALL" from "GROUP" all the loco's work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishmanoz Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 Could you report that to HRMS too please Knap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KNAP Posted January 26, 2017 Share Posted January 26, 2017 I started original thread and have been in contact with HMRS. In fact they have had my resource files for many months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowside Posted January 27, 2017 Author Share Posted January 27, 2017 This is the helpful reply I got from Railmaster Support, who are clearly aware of the issue and want to find a solution:"There is no limit in the code for 60 locos. We know of two users who have had this issue and spent a great deal of time with one of them logged into his computer to try and find out what was causing it. We have a test set-up here with several hundred locos and do not have this issue and have not been able to recreate it thus far. We also know some users with large rosters who also have not come up against this. Something is happening on particular computers (fortunately just a handful) and we have not yet seen enough of these to find a pattern. If you would like us to log into your PC to see if we can find something then we would be happy to do so as we would like this resolved as much as you. We know that locos can be put into groups, but this is not a long-term solution." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishmanoz Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 So most important for anyone with this problem to contact HRMS and allow them to log on to your computer for a good look around to try to get to the bottom of this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Caesar Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 This may be a long shot but may be worth HRMS looking into....Is this not anything to do with the corruption of an Access database file where the program refers back or changes the filename extension to .accdb instead of .mdb? I have not seen this in RailMaster admittedly but have so in a couple of other applications where Access databases are used. The .accdb file extension has been used from Access 2007 while the .mdb extension is for the older Access 2003 and earlier. It is also used in some written Visual Basic programs and can become corrupted on newer machines. If you attempt to open the Resource.mdb file in Access 2016 for example the error message pops up saying "Unrecognised database format..." followed by the path of the file. Could it not be therefore that the default database engines installed with Windows are interfering and trying to default to other formats even though the file should only open in RailMaster? Obviously any database file, once damaged, will not open anywhere. As I said it is a long shot but worth a mention. Curious to know the outcome on this one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
96RAF Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 You would think any db would open in any spreadsheet reader in emergency.You may well lose the pretty formatting and processing stuff but the basic data matrix should be recoverable this way.Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KNAP Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 On basis that HRMS have had my Resource.mdb and program file, I assume they have checked.It woud be odd for files to corrupt at exact same point for at least 4 users. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowside Posted January 28, 2017 Author Share Posted January 28, 2017 I have passed on to Railmaster that the Access db after adding locos which then did not work showed the new locos and it appears in exactly the same data format as ones which did work. So I don't think the problem is with the database (except possibly permissions).. I'm still convinced some code was put in the program for testing and then not removed and forgotten about! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishmanoz Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 If that is true cowside, then what HRMS told you (a problem on only a small number of installations and not a problem on most) would be wrong then wouldn't it. Unlikely. And it's also clear that just giving them your resources.mdb file isn't good enough, get them to log in and look around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrissaf Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 If one assumes that the HRMS statements are correct i.e they have a test set up with 100s of locos configured and cannot replicate the error. Plus only a few users are affected. Then it is logical to look for another reason for the cause of the error. Cowside stated in the very first original post, that he transferred RM to a new PC machine and copied over files from the old PC. Therefore it is logical to deduce that there may be some other change in an associated RM program file that has not yet been set correctly due to manual transfer copying of files. In other words, file changes that would have occurred naturally if the database files had been created by the RM version they now reside upon have not been initiated correctly. I have no idea what these could be, or even if my logic is on the right track. I make the suggestion purely for HRMS to consider in their diagnosis..In a previous reply to another user with the same issue, HRMS suggested (if I recall correctly) that the affected user rebuilt his loco roster from scratch on his new replacement PC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KNAP Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 This is just not logical if this is happening to a number of uses with same number of locos and then work with all locos by using a group to load.HMRS have blamed so farelink - checked byHornby supporte link again - new elinkUSB lead - replacedRogue loco - All locos work using "ALL" as a groupPC = New PCIn addittion they have not solved my program issue, and I have created a new programThet cannot get aer admin to work on my PCTo program 70+ DCC sound locos when it is happening to other users is really a waste of my time, let alone the cost of replacing all the hardwire which was not at fault.In more than 6 montfhs HMRS do not have a good record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Caesar Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 @KnapA little harsh Knap saying HRMS do not have a very good record over the last 6 months, or, indeed, any length of time.I say that because the issue you have is not really a generic one as it appears. HRMS have to eliminate all obvious factors first and in doing so it takes time. Also, whilst not defending HRMS at this point, they do have lots of work to get through. They will be investigating this to the best of their ability and, like myself, who has to investigate broken PC's, laptops, networks, websites and more I and they have to go through procedures that may seem too obvious to some.Also, what may look like one problem that may be causing the issue may actually be a small combination of so they need working out. It all takes time.So, the issue may have been going on for 6 months and you have a replacement eLink unit etc. and other hardware may have been checked and all seems to work fine. It may be that the problem is RailMaster based or database based. The fact that there is no limit or code included for a maximum 60 locos or whatever does not mean that code elsewhere is not interfering with this. Variables can get mixed up. Whilst I have mentioned all this I do hope you read it in the context it is meant in that it is only to sooth things over while HRMS carry out their checks and the best way for them to see the problem is by logging in to your PC as well as those others affected. Otherwise, by not being able to replicate this matter they are working blindly so to speak. Let's hope this can be resolved at the soonest for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yelrow Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 Knap, why cant they hook up to your pc. Team viewer has also been used in the past. I have not known both to fail. Have you something installed thats blocking these apps. john Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KNAP Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 I sent the Resource and Programs files back in early July. It would be nice to have an idea of any conclusion to any tests carried out., otherise there is little point in requesting files.Also rather than just suggesting replacing hardware, it would have useful to check the software by logging on at an earlier stage, as a no cost option.At first aero admin needed permission from windows firewall, this is not usually the case, and then their screen went blank - reason unknown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishmanoz Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 So to clarify Knap, HRMS has yet to be able to log in but you are still trying with them? Or is that not the case? Also as AC said, they need to run through a process to track these unusual problems down and they won't have suggested logging in until it was clear to them that it was needed. At least they are trying for you, and a lot more than some support organizations would. Overall their support record is excellent, including tracking down unusual problems, not just the routine ones. You will find many satisfied users reporting how well they have done in the forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.