Wellwhynot Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 just been reading some posts about track laying and it seems there is a recomended spacing of 67mm why is this so important, and if i lay a smaller oval inside a larger one do i use a mutiple of this measurement depending on what radii curves i use,( hope this makes sence) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howbi Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 If you study the Hornby Track Planner all will be revealed...... https://www.hornby.com/uk-en/hornby-track-planner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jane1707819582 Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 67mm allows enough space between the tracks so enabling running stock to pass each other when on the curves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishmanoz Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 So when you look at the track planner Wwn, you’ll see that the 4 standard radii are each 67mm bigger/smaller than the next track radius. And clearly designed so that there is sufficient spacing between radius 1 and radius 2. But you will need less spacing between 3 and 4 as there is less overhang on the lesser curves. Which probably explains why Peco streamline points geometry is based on 50mm spacing, if I remember this correctly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
96RAF Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 People are reporting that newer trains like the 800 require more room due to longer overhangs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCDR Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 This question of longer overhang is a real issue. On my layout the station has tightly curved platforms but still set so that Bullied 64', and BR Mark 1 coaches clear them. My Railroad Blue Rapier is also OK. However my grand-son fetched his Hornby Pendolino over to run it and it immediately fouled all platforms and would not pass. The curve is about 30" radius quite tight but it does illustrate how difficult this can be. I am generally using Peco's 50mm spacing but there is just one spot where there is occasional slight contact between passing trains where the spacing may be a couple of mm out, but as it just after the station I don't have a lot of leeway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
96RAF Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 My worst example is a streamlined Coronation the front end of which would foul bits of scenery on my old layout.Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkingthedog Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 King class and Class 40's are the offenders on my layout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
96RAF Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 I had a plan to put each radius curve on a master board and run the inside centre and outside ends tracking of each and every loco/rolling stock item in my fleet to use as a definitive no-go area for track laying and scenery. It never happened, likely never will. Maybe tomorrow my friend as they say here.Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.