Rallymatt Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 53 minutes ago, ColinB said: Why, just to please your ego. Forget it. Nobody else is complaining so why you? I have a low tolerance to twaddle. Please give evidence to support the fanciful claims you make. Remember you went back and resurrected this idea of other people being wrong. So, all you need to do is give the evidence to support your claims, some of which are serious legal allegations against Hornby Hobbies PLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
What About The Bee Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 57 minutes ago, ColinB said: ....just to please your ego... Projection. Failure to justify thesis and assertions is self protection of your ego. You simply will not admit you may be incorrect. You made a bunch of outlandish statements. Justify them. Bee 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LTSR_NSE Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 Colin if you start discussing ego, you open up others suggesting you take a moment for self-examination. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rallymatt Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 (edited) Truth has no ego. Edited September 2 by Rallymatt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColinB Posted September 2 Author Share Posted September 2 12 minutes ago, LTSR_NSE said: Colin if you start discussing ego, you open up others suggesting you take a moment for self-examination. Really I think we best end this discussion before one of us says something we regret. As to my comments they were just a logical analysis of the current situation, either way I don't have to justify my actions to any of you. We will have to see how it pans out in say 6 months time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
What About The Bee Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 Hilarious @ColinB You suggested Hornby engages in illegal business practices. That is not "let us see what happens un the future", rather it is "what happened in the past" Justify your assertion or retract your words as incorrect Bee 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rallymatt Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 Logic must be based on reality. Please stop avoiding the issue and answer with evidence to support the claims you make. It shouldn’t be hard as you would have that to even consider it was wise making the comments you did. So let’s see the evidence 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColinB Posted September 2 Author Share Posted September 2 (edited) 5 minutes ago, What About The Bee said: Hilarious @ColinB You suggested Hornby engages in illegal business practices. That is not "let us see what happens un the future", rather it is "what happened in the past" Justify your assertion or retract your words as incorrect Bee What illegal practices, the price fixing? We covered that, of course they don't, they just advise. Someone else actually clarified that now. Can you all shut up before I progress this further, this is bordering on victimisation. Edited September 2 by ColinB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColinB Posted September 2 Author Share Posted September 2 7 minutes ago, Rallymatt said: Logic must be based on reality. Please stop avoiding the issue and answer with evidence to support the claims you make. It shouldn’t be hard as you would have that to even consider it was wise making the comments you did. So let’s see the evidence So what do you want me to prove? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rallymatt Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 (edited) I listed the challenges to the claims you made. Simply provide the evidence to support you claims. Over to you @ColinB PS The clock is ticking Edited September 2 by Rallymatt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rallymatt Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 10 minutes ago, ColinB said: What illegal practices, the price fixing? We covered that, of course they don't, they just advise. Someone else actually clarified that now. Can you all shut up before I progress this further, this is bordering on victimisation. It’s not victimisation, it’s called being held to account. You have a chance to provide evidence to justify your claims. If you can, fair enough, if not…… we can let Hornby decide. Your choice 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColinB Posted September 2 Author Share Posted September 2 Just now, Rallymatt said: It’s not victimisation, it’s called being held to account. You have a chance to provide evidence to justify your claims. If you can, fair enough, if not…… we can let Hornby decide. Your choice What claims, explain? Yes why don't we. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
What About The Bee Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 Put up your evidence of this assertion. You said this Colin. Now justify it. Or admit that you were wrong. Say, "I was wrong, Hornby does not...." And if you wish to escalate this, that suits me as well. Can someone remind me of Martyn's last name? Bee 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rallymatt Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 3 hours ago, Rallymatt said: @ColinBTo be fair the initial part of the post is also factually incorrect. No one made any price promises in respect of TT:120, when compared like for like models, there is a notable difference between OO and TT:120. You claim ‘half the locos won’t appear’ please advise which ones these are. Hornby didn’t freeze out Heljan, Heljan never had anything other than a 3D image showing TT:120 couplings in a press release. Hornby Hobbies PLC do not engage in protectionism practices, to do so would be illegal and that is a very serious allegation to make. The HM 7000 team is in fact very small but hard working. There is no evidence to suggest that non sound versions of HM 7000 decoders will never appear. All in all the post is very misleading and fundamentally inaccurate. @ColinB try these challenges in response to you claims. You only need to provide the evidence that surely you must have had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDS Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 I have locked this thread before it gets completely out of hand. Some posts may be removed later. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts