Alessio Posted April 15, 2015 Share Posted April 15, 2015 I've been actively interested in model railways for 12 years now and in that time I've only ever seen one new 0-4-0 added to Hornby's range - which was when the old Thomas, the 4-wheeled version of the E2, was brought back a few years ago. Surely it's time for Hornby to have a look at maybe adding something different to their range?Likewise the 0-6-0s available haven't changed all that much - GWR Pannier, Jinty, A1X, J94, J13/52 and more recently the J50. All of which, except the J94, are limited usually to a BR livery and a pre-1948 livery (or two). It all means that despite an interest in tank engines, there's nothing that I really want from Hornby in this respect. I've mentioned it before but I'd like to see some more industrial types of tank engines. Pecketts, Barclays, Bagnall, RSH, Hawthorne Leslie, Hunslet, Hudswell Clarke etc etc etc. I think any one of these would offer Hornby far greater flexibility in terms of livery choices and also train sets that could be produced.Anyone else feel there's room for change in this area? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fazy Posted April 16, 2015 Share Posted April 16, 2015 I can't see it to long before hornby brings one out. as DJmodels are to release at least one in the next few years and I sure a second is also planed. But can't remember if thats also from dave. Not to mention the new j94. Heljan are working on a Hunslet. so Hornbys probably watching to see how things sell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The son of Triangman Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 I'm going to be really bold here. How aout the old Tri-ang "Nellie" with a new chassis and DCC socket? Runs and ducks for cover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Postman Prat Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Quote "Runs and ducks for cover" I should think you should take cover - deep cover (lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The son of Triangman Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Thank's PP. I'm in my bunker now. Ha Ha Ha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkingthedog Posted April 25, 2015 Share Posted April 25, 2015 I'm going to be really bold here. How aout the old Tri-ang "Nellie" with a new chassis and DCC socket? Runs and ducks for cover. I agree SoT, and a new body as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
81F Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 I must admit if Hornby brought out a barclay 040 I'd buy one tomorrow (and convert it to the GWR version!) if they brought out a pecket, I'd buy two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCDR Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 I'm going to be really bold here. How aout the old Tri-ang "Nellie" with a new chassis and DCC socket? Runs and ducks for cover. I agree SoT, and a new body as well. There are days when I think I should have a new body too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCDR Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 I guess it is easier and cheaper to put different bodies and liveries on existing chassis / models. The demand for good quality industrial locomotives (also like the case for OO9) is somewhat untested, and therefore much more of a risky investment to tool up a new and more accurate model.The new Sentinel diesel should have helped to alay some of the fears, as it seems to be selling reasonably well.The industrial scene is complicated. There were dozens of manufacturers of small steam and diesel shunting locomotives who each offered a huge range of locomotive types and indeed offered a bespoke service to customers. Hornby now in fact does make examples of the two most common in the Austerity (WD / J94) Barclay 0-6-0ST for steam and the RR/Sentinel 0-4-0 / 4wD diesel. Both these types were used throughout Britain by a wide range of industrial users. A small 0-4-0ST Peckett and a Ruston and Hornsby 48D might be the best we should hope for, but I think it is much more likely we shall have to rely on kit manufacurers for the rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.