James -1313861

Revell 15 is what I use

H8e wold you do the red band?

I have just been reading the reviews on the airfix heinkel HE 111 P-2 and there are loads of 3 star reviews and are all related to part quality an the level of hardness? For example one of them say the little windows on the side were too fidly and needed work to get them to fit, but isn't that what modelmaking is all about. Or that it is missing two crew members, but you can't see them when they are in the aircraft so what is the point in printing them?

What about the poplakov 1-16 Ishak.

Same here, I would be more relieved to see a typhoon on the battlefield than a lightning.

I use PSC and have never had any trouble. So sorry I don't have a solution to your problem.

I love that mustang. Brilliant scheme

The two RAF fighters used today. I want to know which one everyone prefers. Can you please leave a response and a reason why.

Brilliant model of my favourite aircraft, good brush work as well. I use brushes so you aren't alone.

I thought of some more: 1/72 Fleet air arm corsair 1/72 F6F hellcat 1/72 F7F tigercat 1/72 F8F bearcat 1/72 Hawker tempest II 1/24 me 109 E-4 1/24 hurricane

A hard nose fighter bomber 'mossie' in 1/72 would be excellent. And all yhe RAF bombers in 1/144 scale please.

What about a 1/72 Handly Page Halifax. That would go really well with a Lancaster. Or what about a 1/72 C-130J Hercules, an Atlas A-400M. And what about a C-17 Globe master and Boeing B-52 all in 1/72 of course.

Is Dominic the lizard on the top of the koalas unit

To be fair that glider does look good even if it is your worst, but tat varnish adds a sense of realism about the model.

Thanks for all your help